The Simulation Hypothesis: More Evidence From Physics And Astronomy

The Simulation Hypothesis states that there is a high probability that what we call life, the Universe and everything exists as a state of virtual reality within a higher realm of really real reality. We are a computer simulation ‘living’ in a virtual landscape. There are various observations in the physical sciences that are suggestive that this hypothesis is true. Here are some additional examples.
live crypto prices
The Simulation Hypothesis and the Pixelated Universe

Ultimately we know that our really real reality is pixelated in that you can go down only so far before you hit fundamentals that not composed of anything else. So electrons, photons, neutrinos, gluons, quarks are all the pixels that our really real reality is created from. But wait, that also applies to virtual reality; computer simulations, programmed software, etc. The pixels are the digital ones and zeroes that make up virtual reality and could in fact make up the electrons, photons, neutrinos, gluons, quarks, etc. So no matter how you slice and dice things, reality is pixelated. That’s also the case with Quantum Mechanics. You can have this state or this value but not this other state or this other value. This is like a one; not this is like a zero. So our Universe is digital, not analog.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Identical Electrons

Why are all electrons (or positrons, or up-quarks, etc.) identical? Each species of fundamental / elementary particles, like electrons, are absolutely identical. The charge is identical; the mass is identical, etc. Why is that so? Well, if each species of particle has their own specific software code, say electrons are 11011100 and positrons are 00100011 and so on, that explains that.

The Simulation Hypothesis and the Fundamental Constants
ripple price
So we have here a whole potful of nature’s fundamental / physical constants* yet none can be derived from first principles or can any of the values be derived theoretically and to top it all off they have no apparent connection to each other. The speed of light has no apparent relationship to the electron’s electric charge for example.

So, in the Simulation Hypothesis, there would be one separate and apart software code for each of the physical constants.

*Charge on the electron (proton, positron, etc.); mass of the electron (proton, positron, etc.); speed of light in a vacuum; gravitational constant, etc.

The Simulation Hypothesis and the Theory of Everything

There is no Theory of Everything (TOE). You’d expect that if there was just one Mother Nature that all of physics would be unified. There would be one physics. Alas, there are two sets of physics – Quantum Mechanics and Relativity (gravity). Despite thousands of the finest minds, working now for many decades, these two branches of physics have resisted unification. One obvious answer is that there are two separate and apart sets of software, two sets of programs, one each that controls Quantum Mechanics and one that controls Relativity (Gravity).

The Simulation Hypothesis and the Superposition-of-State

The concept of superposition-of-state implies that something can be in two (or more) mutually exclusive states at the same time until such time as an observer looks. Then apparently the associated wave function collapses and you get an either this or that outcome. In any really real reality that would be totally nonsensical. If a coin rolls under your bed, even before you look, you don’t assume that it is both heads up and tails up at the same time. Further, the coin is not in two separate and apart places under the bed even if you don’t know exactly where under the bed it has rolled to. The coin is not in a superposition-of-state even if nobody ever observes it from that moment on. Yet another point about the alleged superposition-of-state and associated collapse of the wave function. Even if the wave function collapses for the initial / first observer (the coin is say heads up), that state of the coin doesn’t apply for each and every other potential observer in the Universe. So the wave function can’t have really collapsed and the coin’s superposition-of-state is still in vogue for all of those potential observers. However, superposition-of-state can be achieved via computer software programed special effects.

Discussion: There is nothing at all different in principle between a material / physical macro object and a physical / material micro object, especially since micro objects collectively make up macro objects.

To prove superposition-of-state you’d need to observe / measure one physical / material object that’s either in two different separate and apart geographical locations at the same time, or else observe / measure this object as having two different and mutually exclusive states (like both heads up AND tails up) at the same time. Now the flaw here is that by the same reasoning that says superposition-of-state exists, any observation / measurement instantaneously collapses that object’s wave function into an either/or state and thus no actual after-the-fact superposition-of-state exists to be offered up as proof that superposition-of-state actually exists in any really real reality sense.

If there is no such thing as superposition-of-state then there can be no spooky-action-at-a-distance (i.e. – quantum entanglement)*, which is not to say there isn’t entanglement, it’s just not spooky. An obvious example of non-spooky entanglement would be say buying a pair of gloves and putting them – one each that is – into two different boxes and mailing those boxes to two different people, each halfway around the world from the other. Now if person A opens their box and the glove therein is a right-handed glove, then instantaneously, faster that the speed of light, that person knows that person B has a left-handed glove in their box. Nothing spooky about it despite that the knowledge that person B had a left-handed glove traveled at faster than light speed to person A. However, there wasn’t any actual transference of information from one glove to the other so there was no violation of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity.

*The Simulation Hypothesis and Quantum Entanglement

How can X instantaneously affect Y when X and Y are light-years apart? Well, in virtual reality, all points (like X and Y) are equidistant from the point of origin or the source, which in this case is the programmed software.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Mathematical Equations

Mathematical equations (simple exponents, etc.): The mathematics that underpins the physical sciences might look pretty scary, but when looked at closely, you’ll note that the exponents and the coefficients nearly always tend to be simple whole numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.) or simple fractions (like 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 2/3, 3/4, etc.). Now this near universal fact goes totally against the grain of what you’d expect from pure probability. An explanation is in order and the Simulation Hypothesis supplies one.

The Simulation Hypothesis and the Big Bang

If you read any modern account of the Big Bang (origin of our Universe) event – and I’ve read dozens – you’ll note, or should note, one very obvious oops that you’ll NEVER read about or see discussed / addressed. And that is, if the entire or total mass / energy contents of our Universe started out being crammed back into a space the size of a tennis ball (or usually even less), what are you going to actually have, especially when terms like “singularity” are tossed around with reckless abandon? I’ll tell you. You’re going to start the origin of our Universe out from the initial condition of there being, of necessity, the Mother of all Black Holes from which nothing in turn can Bang! A Black Hole will of course leak radiation very, very, very slowly (Hawking radiation) but no one Big coherent Bang! So how do cosmologists arrive at having the entire matter / energy contents crammed in the beginning back into the size of a tennis ball (or less)?

Starting with observations made today that the Universe is expanding, cosmologists wind the clock back (using their mathematical / physical equations) to a nanosecond after Time = Zero which translates into that tennis ball (or less) size. Now IMHO this is totally unjustified especially given that those same equations suggest that the Universe was opaque until some roughly 400,000 years or thereabouts after the Big Bang event. Thus, cosmologists have no way of actually knowing via direct astronomical observations if their equations are telling them a reality story prior to 400,000 years after the Big Bang event. In that 400,000 year interval, it’s 100% theory as to the state of play rather than discovering the state of play via actual observation. This is just about as unjustified an approach as if they filmed the inflation of a hot air balloon and then taking that expansion rate over time and then running the equation clock backwards until such time as they conclude that the hot air balloon was the size of a tennis ball, or pea, or even less. That approach would be nonsense. So why is it allowed in cosmology?

So either the Big Bang event happened in a geographical region large enough to prevent the formation of the Mother of all Black Holes, or else – software / special effects rule the origin of our Universe. The Big Bang event (let there be light) and a software program kicking in are quite compatible.

The Simulation Hypothesis and the Multiverse

This one is a no-brainer. If a ‘person’ or ‘persons’ unknown have simulated what we call our Universe then they have probably simulated lots, and lots, and lots of other universes, all starting with variations large and small on the programming software that created our simulated landscape and virtual reality. It’s the ultimate cast-your-fate-to-the-wind physics and cosmological thought experiments, or ‘what if’ research. Some simulated universes allow for A, B, & C and some for X, Y, and Z and some for A, M, and Z and on and on it goes. Some simulated universes contain no symmetries; some no antimatter at all; some with variations on the spin, charge and masses of the fundamental particles; some that allow time travel; somewhere where mass and energy are not equivalent; some where there is no uncertainty principle; some where the inverse cube law holds sway; some universes with Big Crunches, Big Rips, and even Steady State universes; and maybe some where the speed of light is the minimum possible velocity. Collectively it’s a Multiverse.

The Simulation Hypothesis and Neith of Venus

Neith was a ‘natural’ satellite that was observed by both amateur and professional astronomers several centuries ago. It was so actually observed that it was formally named – Neith. Alas, Venus has no natural satellite. So, Neith somehow popped into existence and then popped out of existence. Were all of the observations delusional or illusional? Now if things just pop into and out of existence without explanation, that’s suggestive of special effects or software. Popping in and out of existence is one of those facets known as “it can’t be therefore it isn’t” vs. “I know what I saw”.

The Simulation Hypothesis and a Logical Absurdity

There are two concepts that I have difficulty reconciling. The first is the First Law of Thermodynamics which among other concepts states that matter / energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Thus, that leads to a conclusion that matter / energy has always existed. The second is the quantum mantra – anything that can happen will happen given enough time. Well, if matter / energy have always existed, that’s more than enough time for anything and everything that’s possible to happen, happens. I mean an awful lot of weird stuff can happen given an infinite amount of time. The concept of a Boltzmann Brain is just one such idea.* Let your imagination run wild and you can easily come up with way over six just about impossible and utterly absurd things that must have happened. However, software overrides that First Law of Thermodynamics in that any software program is finite and the possible scenarios are fixed so not everything that can happen (like a Boltzmann Brain) does happen.

*Equally events like you would quantum tunnel through your bedroom wall into the hallway instead of using the bedroom door; a fairly balanced coin would land heads up a trillion times in a row; or a monkey would eventually type out the complete works of Shakespeare or the Bible (even and the Bible).

Conclusion: The Simulation Hypothesis and The Twilight Zone

Whoever, whatever, programmed our cosmos and our local landscape had a sense of the absurd. Perhaps that’s our Supreme Programmer’s sense of humor coming to the fore. What absurdities? Quantum physics is absurd. The fact that we just can’t come up with a Theory of Everything is absurd. An accelerating expansion rate for the cosmos is absurd. Dark Energy and Dark Matter are absurd concepts. Crop circles are absurd (but they’re here). The Loch Ness Monster is absurd (but people report seeing it or them). Long Delayed Echoes are absurd (but verified). Transient Lunar Phenomena are absurd (but verified). Those Martian rock ‘anomalies’ like lizards, rats and skulls are absurd (but they have been photographed). Biblical ‘miracles’ are absurd but millions believe they happened. The SETI “WOW” signal is an absurdity but it happened. There are all manner of archaeological absurdities, but I’ll mention just one – The Temple of Jupiter at Baalbek in modern day Lebanon. There are many things that are absurd when it comes to the human species: here’s one – humans are the only species where the saying “don’t shoot until you see the whites of their eyes makes actual sense. If photons cannot escape from a Black Hole then neither can gravitons. Gravitons convey the gravitational force which means that Black Holes exert no gravity. A Black Hole without gravity is therefore an absurdity. Then you have quasars that appear linked but have vastly differing red shifts which is also an absurdity. The missing satellite of Venus, Neith, is another absurdity as in how can satellites vanish? You have physical constants that apparently aren’t – constant that is. Time travel to the past is both theoretically possible (General Relativity) and theoretically impossible (paradoxes) – it’s an absurdity to have both something that can be and not be at the same time. Ghosts are absurd yet there are probably more sightings of ghosts going back to ancient times than there have been sightings of UFOs. Perhaps UFOs, the “Greys” and related are also absurdities, but they exist in good company with the rest of what passes for our simulated cosmic ‘Twilight Zone’.

Addendum: How could our video / computer game characters know (assuming they had consciousness) that they weren’t in a really real reality instead of in a virtual reality? They couldn’t and they wouldn’t. But even if they could, what could they or would they deduce about our (human) reality? Their conclusions would be just pure guesswork since we (humans) have created such a massive diversity of virtual reality worlds / landscapes that the inhabitants of these virtual reality worlds would have so little in common with each other that their guesstimates of our (human) reality would be equally diverse. The inhabitants of a “Game of Thrones” virtual reality would think we humans co-existed with dragons. The inhabitants of a virtual “Haunted House” reality world full of spooky ghosts would think that would be the reality of their human creators as well. The inhabitants of a “Star Wars” video game might conclude that really real reality humans had the ‘force’ with them and that Darth Vader and the Death Star were real threats.

In other words, if we (humans) are virtual humans and not physical humans then we couldn’t have much of a handle on what our computer programmer’s reality is actually like.

Addendum Two: Many of us have heard about the Holographic Universe scenario which basically postulates that like a hologram, our Universe appears to be 3-D but is actually 2-D. Now think of a video / computer game or computer simulation. That simulation appears to be 3-D (i.e. – simulated characters can move to the front and to the back as well as up-down and left-right) but of course is actually displayed on a flat 2-D surface / monitor.


Is the human brain a quantum computer?

Quantum magic

Quantum computers use quantum processors that use elementary particles such as neutrons, electrons, and / or atoms instead of integrated circuits and transistors, as in classical processors. The two most “crazy and magical” properties of these particles include:
expedia flights only
• First, after a certain interaction, they are constantly “attached” to other particles around it. For example, when the spin of a particle is measured in the “up” position, the other particle would be in the opposite “down” position immediately (ie faster than the speed of light), even if it is very far away. Large collections of tangled particles (if present in the brain) can behave “organized” or coordinated over long distances.
cheap airline tickets
• Second, they exist in the superposition of situations before any dimension. For example, an electron may have two different energy levels or rotate up and down at the same time. However, when measured, they will be at a certain energy level or in the direction of rotation – we say that they “fall” to a certain position.
hotels flights
When using classic processors, we set a bit to “1” or “0”. In a quantum processor, for example, we can set the spin-down state of the electron to “1” and the rotation state to “0”. But until we measure it, it will be “1” and “0” at the same time – just as a rotating coin does not have a “head” or a “tail” when it rotates. Thus, a quantum bit or “qubit” can represent “1” AND “0” at the same time, unlike the “bit” of a classic processor, it can only represent “1” or “0” at a given time. Bits are binary and dot-like, but cubit is “space-like” and “fuzzy”; this allows you to process more data in parallel using the superposition property. A bit can represent either 1 or 0 at a point in time, and a qubit can represent both at the same time.1
hotels flights
“1” and “0” can be assigned to different physical attributes of elementary particles. For example, we can use the spin-up or spin-down states of the nucleus of an atom, the different energy levels of the electrons in the atom, and even the orientation of the plane of polarization of light particles or photons.
flying spirit airlines
Quantum computation using phosphorus atoms

In 2013, a research team led by Australian engineers from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) created the first working quantum bit based on the spin of the nucleus of a single phosphorus atom inside a protective deposit of zero non-magnetic silicon atoms. spin In a new article in the journal Nature, they reported that they had achieved record-high accuracy in writing and reading quantum data using nuclear spin. 2
sw airlines reservations

Because the nucleus of a phosphorus atom has a very weak magnetic field and the lowest number of spins (which means that it is less sensitive to electric and magnetic fields), it can withstand almost no magnetic noise or electrical interference from the environment. , is immune. It is further “protected” from noise by a bed of surrounding zero-spin silicon atoms. As a result, the nuclear spin has a longer sequence time, which allows the data to be stored for a longer period of time, resulting in a higher level of accuracy.

“The nucleus of the phosphorus atom consists of a nuclear spin that can act as an excellent memory gubernator due to its very low sensitivity to noise in the environment.”

Andrew Zurak reports on the work of the UNSW Team, 3
delta tickets
In 2014, another team (this time Dutch-US collaboration) used nuclear spins of phosphorus atoms in quantum calculations to achieve 99.99% higher accuracy and a longer matching time of more than 35 seconds. 4.5
continental airlines official site
Quantum Computers in our heads?

What does all this have to do with our brains? There are numerous examples in quantum biology that question quantum processing; For example, there is evidence that birds use quantum processes in their retinas to navigate the globe, and that photosynthesis continues more efficiently by achieving long-lived related quantum states. It has also been observed that certain aspects of human sense of smell and human vision require quantum processing. Thus, it is not surprising that we look for quantum processing in the human brain.
frontier airlines
One of the first popular hypotheses was made by the prominent physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hammeroff. They hypothesized that quantum processing could take place in the microtubules of neurons.6 However, most scientists were skeptical because quantum coherence, which usually occurs in highly isolated environments and cold temperatures, was considered a hot, humid, and noisy environment. impossible to achieve. Neither Penrose nor Hammeroff responded satisfactorily to this critique of their theories. However, there have been recent advances in the extension of sequence times, and research teams around the world are in a hurry to extend compliance times at room temperature with some success.7.8 Thus, the jury is still focusing on the Penrose-Hammeroff theory.
Fisher’s founding ideas

Recently, in 2015, Matthew Fisher, a physicist at the University of California, developed a model in which nuclear spins in phosphorus atoms could play the role of cubit. This model is very similar to that discussed in the previous section due to its laboratory development; the exception is that this time it was applied to the human brain, which is rich in phosphorus.9
united airlines reservations
“Can we be quantum computers, not intelligent robots that design and create quantum computers ourselves?”

Matthew Fisher, 10

Fisher argued convincingly that the spins of the nuclei of phosphorus atoms could be sufficiently isolated (with a protective cloud of electrons around them and a protective shield of the zero-spin atomic field) and could also be less “distracting” by quantum noise. its weak magnetic field (due to the low number of spins) thus allows to maintain quantum coherence. (The results of the laboratory work and experiments discussed in the previous section have confirmed and confirmed this fact.) Thus, in an environment rich in electric fields such as the brain, the nuclei of phosphorus atoms would be in a sufficiently isolated environment.

The process begins with a chemical compound in the cell called pyrophosphate. It consists of two interconnected phosphates – one phosphorus atom, each surrounded by a large number of zero-spin oxygen atoms (a situation similar to the laboratory study discussed above, in which the phosphorus atom is placed inside zero-spin silicon atoms). The interaction between the spins of the phosphates causes them to mix. One of the resulting configurations results in zero rotation or “single” state of maximum confusion. The enzymes then break down the tangled phosphates into two free phosphate ions, which continue to mix as they move away. These tangled phosphates then combine separately with calcium ions and oxygen atoms, as shown below, to form Posner molecules.
airline tickets

These clusters provide “protection” to tangled pairs in addition to outside interference so that they can maintain sequences over longer distances in the brain. When Fisher estimated the compatibility time of these molecules, it turned out to be an incredible 105 seconds – a whole day.12
cheap hotels
What’s next?

Although Fisher does not explain in detail what will happen next – this is important if we want to get an overview – this author will try to do so. Many tangled nuclei of phosphorus atoms (within the Posner molecules) would spread to a large area of ​​the brain. They will be in a state of overlap, existing in the form of waves for some time before collapsing. When a collapse occurs, the electrons in the atom respond. Electrons determine the chemical properties of atoms. Thus, the deposition causes a change in the chemical properties of the phosphorus atoms, resulting in a cascade of chemical reactions that send a cascade of neurotransmitters to the synapses of the neurons. The train of electrochemical signals is then combined to create a perception that is interpreted based on human life experiences.
cheap travel sites
This solves a long-standing question that has puzzled scientists in neuroscience: How can the brain integrate information from different parts of the brain to create a coherent perception? Perhaps the simultaneous dissolution of the nuclear spins of phosphorus atoms entangled in different layers and parts of the brain with the “Fisher mechanism” (a term coined by this author) may be the answer.


The most obvious limitation is that Fischer’s ideas have not yet been thoroughly tested, although certain aspects (such as the longer coherence time of phosphorus atoms) have already been tested in the laboratory. However, there are plans to do so. The first test will be whether Posner molecules are present in extracellular fluids and whether they can mix with each other. Fisher proposes to test this in the laboratory by inducing chemical reactions to circulate the nuclear spins of phosphorus, then by pouring the solution into two test tubes and looking for quantum correlations in the given light.12

Roger Penrose believes that Fischer’s mechanism can only help to explain long-term memory, but it may not be enough to explain consciousness.12 He believes that the Penrose-Hammeroff formula, which he says is more massive than nuclei, is a healthier explanation. to this end, although most scholars are skeptical. Interestingly, Posner molecules (with mixed particles) are found in these microtubules – then both Fisher’s and Penrose-Hammeroff’s hypotheses would be at least partially true. (Everyone loves a happy ending!)

In a word

1. Quantum calculations with isolated and protected phosphorus atoms in the laboratory have been shown to result in higher accuracy results and longer coherence times.

2. Phosphorus is abundant in the brain.

3. The human brain (and perhaps the brains of other animals) can use the nuclear spins of phosphorus atoms as cubits to perform quantum calculations.


1. Photo: Zhang, J. (September 28, 2019). What makes quantum computing special? Medium.com.

2. Pla, J., Tan, K., Dehollain, J., Lim, W., Morton, J., Zwanenburg, F., Jamieson, D., Dzurak, A., & Morello, A. (2013) . High-precision reading and control of nuclear spin gubit in silicone. Nature, 496 (7445), 334-338.

3. Dzurak, A. (October 15, 2014). Silicon Qubits May Be Key to Quantum Revolution, SciTech Daily.

4. Muhonen, J., Dehollain, J., Laucht, A., Hudson, F., Kalra, R., Sekiguchi, T., Itoh, K., Jamieson, D., McCallum, J., Dzurak, A .., & Morello, A. (2014). Storage of quantum information in a nanoelectronic device for 30 seconds. Nature Nanotechnology, 9 (12), 986-991.

5. Veldhorst, M., Hwang, J., Yang, C., Leenstra, A., de Ronde, B., Dehollain, J., Muhonen, J., Hudson, F., Itoh, K., Morello, A., & Dzurak, A. (2014). Quantum dot qubit addressed with fault tolerance control. Nature Nanotechnology, 9 (12), 981-985.

6. Hameroff, S. and Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe. Physics of Life Reviews, 11 (1), 39-78.

7. Herbschleb, E., Kato, H., Maruyama, Y., Danjo, T., Makino, T., Yamasaki, S., Ohki, I., Hayashi, K., Morishita, H., Fujiwara, M .., & Mizuochi, N. (2019). Ultra long compatibility times between solid state rotations at room temperature. Nature Communications, 10 (1), 3766.

8. Miao, K., Blanton, J., Anderson, C., Bourassa, A., Crook, A., Wolfowicz, G., Abe, H., Ohshima, T., & Awschalom, D. (2020) . Universal compatibility protection in solid spin gubit. Elm, eabc5186.

9. Fisher, MPA (2015). Quantum cognition: The ability to work with nuclear spins in the brain. Annals of Physics, 362, 593-602.

10. Fernandes, S. (March 27, 2018) Are We Quantum Computers? Current (Science + Technology).

11. Swift, M., Van de Walle, C., & Fisher, M. (2018). Posner molecules: from atomic structure to nuclear spins. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 20 (18), 12373-12380.

12. Brooks, M. (December 15, 2015). Is quantum physics behind your brain’s ability to think? New Scientist.

The Five Laws of Gold

We live in a time of impatience, and when it comes to money, we want more of it today, not tomorrow. Whether it’s a mortgage deposit or cleaning up credit cards that deplete our energy after we stop enjoying what we buy with them, it’s just as good. When it comes to investing, we want easy options and quick returns. Thus, the existing mania for cryptocurrencies. Why invest in nanotechnology or machine learning when Ethereum is locked in an endless upward spiral and Bitcoin is a gift that continues to give?

A century ago, the American writer George S Clason took a different approach. In the richest man in Babylon, he gave the world a treasure trove of financial principles based on what may seem outdated today: prudence, prudence, and wisdom. Clason used the wise men of ancient Babylon as his spokesman for his financial advice, but that advice is as relevant today as it was a century ago, when the Wall Street accident and the Great Depression approached.

Take, for example, the five laws of gold. Wherever you are in life, if you want to put your personal finances on a solid foundation, these are for you:

Law №1: Gold comes with a happy and increasing amount to anyone who invests at least a tenth of their earnings to create property for the future of themselves and their families. In other words, save 10% of your income. Minimum. If possible, save more than that. And it’s not 10% for next year’s holiday or a new car. It is long-lasting. Your 10% may include pension contributions, ISAs, premium bonds, or any high-interest / limited entry savings account. Well, interest rates for depositors are now at a historic low, but who knows where they will be in five or ten years? Compound interest means that your savings will grow faster than you think.

Law №2: Gold works diligently and happily for a wise owner who finds him a lucrative job. So if you want to invest instead of saving, do it wisely. There are no cryptocurrencies or pyramid schemes. We focus on the words “profitable” and “employment”. Make sure your money works for you, but keep in mind that the best thing you can hope for on this side of the rainbow is not lottery winnings, but long-term fixed returns. In practice, this is most likely the shares of established companies that offer regular dividends and offer a steady upward trend in stock prices. You can invest directly or through a fund manager in the form of a single trust, but before you leave with a penny, see Laws 3, 4 and 5 …

Law №3: Gold clings to the care of its prudent owner who, on the advice of the wise men who rule it, puts it to bed. Talk to a qualified, experienced financial advisor before doing anything. If you don’t know one, do some research. Check them online. What experiences do they have? What kind of customers? Read the reviews. Call them first and feel what they can offer you, then decide if a face-to-face meeting will work. See their commission arrangements. Are they independent or affiliated with a particular company, on a contractual basis to push that company’s financial products? A decent financial advisor will encourage you to get the basics before investing in emerging markets and space travel: retirement, life insurance, a place to live. When you are happy to find a counselor you can trust, listen to them. Trust their advice. But regularly review your relationship with them, say it every year, and if you’re not happy, look elsewhere. Most likely, if your decision was sound in the first place, you will stay with the same consultant for many years.

Law №4: Gold moves away from a person who invests in a business or purpose that is not approved by those who do not know it or are experienced in keeping it. If you have in-depth knowledge of food retail, invest in a network of supermarkets that increase market share. Similarly, if you work for a company with an employee shareholding scheme, it makes no sense to take advantage of it if you are confident that your company has good prospects. However, you should not invest in any market or financial product that you never understand (remember Crash!) Or that you cannot fully explore. If you are interested in trying your hand at currency trading or option trading and have a financial advisor, talk to them first. If they are not speeding, ask them to direct you to someone who is there. It’s best to avoid anything you’re not sure about, no matter how great the potential revenue.

Law №5: Gold avoids a person who seeks impossible profits or who follows the attractive advice of swindlers and swindlers, or who relies on his own inexperience. Again, the fifth law comes after the fourth law. If you start researching the internet for financial advice and wealth creation ideas, and invest £ 999 in their “system” to turn £ 1 into £ 1XXXXXX, your inbox will soon be full of “scammers and swindlers” who promise you the world. Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Remember, gold is only a shovel seller who makes money in a hurry. Get the wrong shovel and you will soon be in debt. For a system that has no proven value, you won’t just pay through the nose; By doing so, you will probably lose more than you paid for it. At the very least, you should check the original reviews of the product. Never buy a system, investment vehicle or financial product from any company that is not registered with a national regulatory body, such as the UK Financial Conduct Authority.

3 Strong Keys to the World of Digital Currency – Cryptocurrency

Welcome to the world of crypto!

– Blockchain technology domain

– Cryptocurrency market

– Bitcoin payment system locker.

So this is the trend, or you can call it the “digital currency world” with an excellent move to rise in the game.

If you avoid Bitcoin and cryptocurrency today, you will fall into a bad ditch tomorrow. Not knowing how to stop the steps is actually the present and future of the currency. From its inception to the present day, it has grown and helped many people around the world.

Whether it’s the Blockchain to record transactions, or the Bitcoin system to manage the entire payment structure, or the Erc20 token wallet to set rules and policies for the Ethereum token – everything goes hand in hand and is heading for a new currency beam around the world.

Sounds great, doesn’t it?

Moreover, with the advent of such a successful currency regime, many companies like to be part of this game. In fact, everything consists of helping businesses or organizations to acquire Blockchain technology or cryptocurrency without any hassle through a reliable Blockchain development company. These companies with a lot of knowledge and potential are developing this currency and playing an important role in the digital economy.

For just a nano-second, what will happen if we assume that cryptocurrency no longer exists?

Maybe time will counter-attack your mind!

Launched for the first time by Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin was a colonial and has evolved into an innovative digital currency with a spectrum of good things from the start.

Thus, the question arises – will the development of cryptocurrency or its creator, the company that developed the cryptocurrency, disappear or remain until the end?

In fact, it is impossible to predict the future, but we can say that the cryptocurrency or Erc20 or Blockchain or Bitcoin Wallet Development Company will be there with the same enthusiasm and passion to lend a hand to business verticals and organizations.

John Digonahoe, former CEO of eBay, said: “Digital Currency will be a very strong thing.”

And over time, that is likely to change.

In fact, there are some solid reasons behind the success of this concept.

Evidence of fraud:

Blockchain is associated with cryptocurrency. Thus, each transaction is recorded in this open book, avoiding any fraud. And all identities are encrypted to prevent identity theft.

Erc20 pays attention to all rules and protocols, so rules and commands are not violated. If you are involved, then don’t forget to contact the Erc20 development company and develop it according to the rules.

You are the sole owner:

There is no third party or other helper or electronic system to evaluate what you are doing. Only you and your customer have a complete experience. Isn’t that a great concept?

However, the settlement happens immediately and everything happens without any other barrier between you and your seller. The call at the end of the day is yours.

Easy to approach:

The internet made everything accessible and at your fingertips. It plays an invaluable role in the digital currency market or exchange market. Instead of using traditional and time-consuming methods, you will have a better choice for currency exchange. And it’s a great way to find someone who is passionate about cryptocurrency.

If you are a business owner and are looking forward to meeting cryptocurrencies in your area, always move forward with determination. Approach a trusted dealer or develop a cryptocurrency exchange, discuss everything with all the cards that are opened, and then hit the ball in court.

Comparison with Nexty Coin Nano Coin – Crypto

Nano and Nexty: Are these real and practical cash alternatives? Let’s learn!

Blockchain is no longer hip-hop-talk! Bitcoin has revolutionized the way many of us look at currencies, books, money transfers and transactions. The beauty of all virtual currencies is that almost everyone tries to solve the problem. And here is our coin of interest – Nexty is starting to work. At the time of writing, the similarity of the Nexty platform will be compared with the Nano-XRB to better understand this platform.

Simply put, the Nexty platform is designed as an operating system that eliminates the concept of transaction fees, while providing ultra-fast transfers to make it easier for users. In addition, transfers are very fast, because transactions are Bitcoin and so on. does not require the approval of miners, as in other virtual currencies such as.

However, according to a white paper published by the creators of Nexty, the main use of Nexty is intended for newly established e-commerce enterprises to help generate public funding. With no transaction, ultra-fast transfers (2 seconds! And this is almost real time) and no confirmation fee, it will be less difficult to raise funds. The coin is surgically targeting e-commerce stores, as this will develop an ecosystem in which these stores will accept NTY coins from buyers.

The concept behind NTY makes everyday online trading a comfortable experience. The team behind NTY consists of Blockchain developers and established marketers. Some of the team members have ten to 12 years of experience in preparing and marketing a full team.

Some of you may argue that Nano – formerly known as Railblocks XRB – already performs the same functions as NTY. The XRB coin is a bit unique because its property uses block-grid data structures. Therefore, each Nano account has its own blockchain that reduces delays for fast transfers. In addition, XRB is energy and resource efficient and does not require a high-level GPU system to perform the operation. However, the Nano does not come with smart-contract capability. Smart contracts are designed to exchange triggers for any cryptocurrency. These agreements facilitate the exchange of financial assets, real estate, shares or any tangible or intangible property. Smart contracts also eliminate the need for brokers to carry our cryptocurrency perfectly for active exchange. Apart from this difference, NTV and XRB (Nano) are more or less the same. Another key feature of the Nexty platform is its integration into existing e-commerce applications such as Joomla. According to NTY developers, integration takes a maximum of 3-4 hours.

To achieve NTY’s supply-demand balance, the platform comes with a built-in smart staking program. This application offers bonuses and credits for the purchase, sale and maintenance of Nexty. The system is designed for both investors and everyday users.

The capabilities of Nexty and Nano platforms are great. Just imagine a world where cryptocurrency replaces ordinary wallets and transactions are faster! For example, if a store owner accepts BitCoin, he or she may not deliver the goods or services to you until the transaction has been approved by a number of minors. Now, re-imagine paying for goods and services through a fast-moving currency with zero transaction fees, regardless of any small checks!